LED national standard why long-awaited outdoor digital signage

Jul 21, 2017

Leave a message

LED industry called the national standard has been a long time, why long-awaited do not come? Is the relevant state departments not enough attention? Or the relevant state departments of the LED industry is indeed doubts? Or experts and scholars do not act as?


Although the LED industry in China has been very hot, the Chinese government also attaches great importance to the development of the industry, but the maturity of the industry, the government and experts are afraid to assert that this is no doubt the fact. The government does not speak, the experts certainly can not move. Moreover, the Chinese experts have never dare to more than half the way. Not for the world first, can only pick up the teeth, this is the practice of today's experts - they only cooked the apple, only to the ground to pick up a few rotten apples. Especially the LED industry, the Chinese experts have no system and in-depth study, even if the ducks shelves, at best, is half a bucket of water, the information has long been obsolete!


It can be said that today, China's lighting industry, the so-called LED experts, has lagged far behind the industry and enterprises, let alone to guide and lead the industry. They are at best the level of science, rather than the industry pioneer and can rely on the core research strength! Look forward to such a group of people to do the LED industry standards, really some nonsense!


It is the wistful industry, has been in the downtown, have bustling, for the introduction of LED national standard shouting! Unfortunately, these voices are too far away, has been buzzing at the bottom, can not reach the temple of the high experts and the relevant departments there! Even if they got there, they turned a deaf ear or was powerless - because they did not dare to risk or have no strength to take the risk! Imagine that they can not have the heart of the child, how can dare to play a large national standard LED?


As a result, chaos appeared - all in the development and trial of their own local standards. May be the original intention is good (do not rule out the interests of the drive), but the confusion and fighting on the inevitable. You have your standard, I have my standard; you do not agree with me, I do not agree with you; you say I am not professional, I say you nonsense. Here by standard is qualified, there has become unqualified, the industry into a pot of porridge! Government dilemma, business shook his head sigh, people smoke and mirrors, who do not know who is wrong, who is right, who is good or bad. More ambitious business, manipulation of associations and experts, regardless of seeking truth from facts, blindly let the local standards towards their own business in the direction of the tilt, which makes the standard imbalance, foul!


Local standard public that the public right, the woman said the woman is reasonable, this situation when the worthy? It seems that only the national standard out of the right and wrong. National standards dystocia, the industry will be tough. Do we have to wait for the standards of Europe and the United States come out later, we follow the people's ass go? If at that time, no matter how good the industry and business in China, it can only become a "second-class citizens". Therefore, China's LED industry, the national standard is not a day, the industry will draw a heavy question mark!


Hope that the Chinese government executives can be clear, early traction; also hope that Chinese experts do not deaf, quickly fulfill their duties, the introduction of LED national standards, the end of chaos and disputes, to the industry development of clean sky. If you really old can not, you can rely on the younger generation; if the younger generation is too tender, you can rely on the strength of enterprises and associations, wide open words, and listen to the Ming, naturally able to develop a scientific and fair standards - China's LED industry, Is representative. If we do not worry, at least you can first develop a trial standard, and gradually upgrade to it 1.1,1.2,1.3 on the line? Industry standards also have a process of upgrading Well, we are afraid of what?